@_100101890 "one mind at a time rule" unfounded - there's nothing that would prevent two minds running simultaneously on the same substrate
-
-
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah yeah - it's either baseless or virtually trivial, at minimum. W potential timesharing, weak presumption of identity, channel >1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_______248190
@allgebrah > plexing, qcomp...and have we met the biome yet? It's a stretch even to say a totally typical human CNS, as presently known to >1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @_______248190
@allgebrah > function, is possessed by only and exactly one 'mind'. The constraint claim isn't even evaluable if you can't count (the) minds1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @_______248190
@_100101890 apart from the obvious stuff I'm fond of the idea that there may be a slow mind and a fast mind running entirely independently
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah yes! Speed, freq. are close enough to same thing from infoprocess' POV. Another form of multiplexing, w/ differential allocation?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_______248190
@allgebrah ..hm. where would you see that? An (eg. Amazon) ecosystem? Or metabolism/chemosynthesis-centric information hub like a human GMB?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_______248190
@_100101890 definitely a(n eco)system, for example those wandering lichens could support a slimemold-like mode and a cellular turing mode
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@_100101890 or like in Lady of Mazes, a role playing game with rules so complex that a mind runs on them (w/o participants being aware)
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah that game(stack/( )hole/(-complex) sounds capable of being profoundly dangerous, fantastic even else... definitely must have2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@_100101890 oh I do have an excerpt from that book quoted somewhere though: http://www.synkretie.net/writings/wallpaper.html …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.