Yes, sometimes he argues that from the inside we are "blind" to the outside, or have no access to the underlying process ...
Conversation
Replying to
I do think brains are a tricky substrate, but then again I've arrived at testable hypotheses through introspection alone.
1
1
Replying to
(and had them confirmed by neuroscience, which was fun. Would have to search, but it was about modeling memory formation)
2
Replying to
Oh yeah here: nature.com/neuro/journal/
Through introspection, I had mapped out the "shape" of a memory and its retrieval
1
1
Replying to
arriving at a model where related memories would be stored "next" to each other, and a recall would strengthen it
1
Replying to
incidentally "crowding out" related memories that were less salient and lived on the "side streets".
2
Replying to
then a few weeks later I read about that paper and it just fit together perfectly.
1
1
Replying to
I do not think the neurons are physically arranged that way, but what counts here is the inside view and conceptual space.
2
1
Replying to
I have long been intrigued by the interplay between volitional and involuntary memory retrieval.
1
Replying to
tbh being really stoned helped - it slowed down memory retrieval to an introspectable level, saw the page faults/cache misses
1
Replying to
that time, I had a memory glitch (involunt. recall) where I got the wrong one, and wondered "just why did that just happen?"
Replying to
being stoned is usually awful for thinking and meditation (I've tried), but for certain kinds of introspection it's useful
2
Replying to
I've recently given up a weed addiction and I do believe my thinking is more clear, I'm certainly sleeping less.... .
1
Show replies