@DIA_operative Choosing from your nobles ends in heredity (eventually one will appoint their own bloodline).
-
-
Replying to @allgebrah
it might be inevitable given a highly clannish culture but outbred NW Europeans? It's at least not easily fated.
@allgebrah1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @DIA_operative
@DIA_operative I'm familiar with HBD, yes. However I just couldn't parse the "but outbred NW Europeans" part.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah I'm saying it is less likely that an outbred NW European society will result in clannish or familial/inbred corruption.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DIA_operative
@DIA_operative modern NWE I assume? Royals have always worked differently, they have other incentives for children as the middle class has.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah Also, there is another, better, option, not royalty but neocameralism. A CEO selected by stockholders.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DIA_operative
@DIA_operative That selects for sociopaths though :/ (Or puts the market entirely in charge which is a bad idea)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah Stockholders want to increase the value of their property, so they select for competence, which you may think is sociopathic1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@DIA_operative They want to increase dividends, not property value. Otherwise Amazon stocks wouldn't have tanked recently.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.