it might be inevitable given a highly clannish culture but outbred NW Europeans? It's at least not easily fated. @allgebrah
-
-
-
-
Replying to @DIA_operative
@DIA_operative I'm familiar with HBD, yes. However I just couldn't parse the "but outbred NW Europeans" part.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah I'm saying it is less likely that an outbred NW European society will result in clannish or familial/inbred corruption.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DIA_operative
@DIA_operative modern NWE I assume? Royals have always worked differently, they have other incentives for children as the middle class has.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah Also, there is another, better, option, not royalty but neocameralism. A CEO selected by stockholders.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DIA_operative
@DIA_operative That selects for sociopaths though :/ (Or puts the market entirely in charge which is a bad idea)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah The market is entirely in charge. What do you think an election is but a market mechanism?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DIA_operative
@DIA_operative Democratic elections as implemented aren't (absence of homo oeconomicus). A futarchy maybe is.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@DIA_operative But the market doesn't optimize for ethics. And markets tend to merge, monetary markets try to influence the political ones.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.