All we knew was that the virus acted very specifically: it took out an idea, excised it from the mind, and left a taboo in its stead.
-
-
Replying to @allgebrah
Those affected became unable to think certain thoughts: if they so much as resembled the killed idea, they fizzled.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @allgebrah
Philosophy grew a new branch: Much like neurologists learn about the brain by studying specific lesions, they now examined ontologies.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @allgebrah
Mathematicians created new formalisms and a calculus of minds: Some were now utterly incompatible, requiring a mediator chosen by algorithm.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
The ontotypical mainstream consisted of people whose minds had taken only grazing hits. Still, language adapted in fascinating ways. Had to.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
But others segregated themselves into new communities. They would settle in cities that knew no straight lines, right angles, or lacked red.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
Some have lost specific numbers. Zero, One and Two form the most significant and different groups, with three or more lumped under "other".
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @allgebrah
Two: no duality. There can be no relationship without a mediator or capstone of some sort. There is always Yin, Yang and the Other.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
One: no unity. No identity. Nothing exists except in relation to another. Nothing is singular. They don't even have a definite article.
-
-
Replying to @allgebrah
Zero: no absence. No empty space. No thing has a beginning or end, it forms a continuum through time, only with the occasional phase change.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.