All we knew was that the virus acted very specifically: it took out an idea, excised it from the mind, and left a taboo in its stead.
Conversation
Replying to
Those affected became unable to think certain thoughts: if they so much as resembled the killed idea, they fizzled.
1
1
Replying to
Philosophy grew a new branch: Much like neurologists learn about the brain by studying specific lesions, they now examined ontologies.
1
1
Replying to
Mathematicians created new formalisms and a calculus of minds: Some were now utterly incompatible, requiring a mediator chosen by algorithm.
1
2
Replying to
The ontotypical mainstream consisted of people whose minds had taken only grazing hits. Still, language adapted in fascinating ways. Had to.
1
2
Replying to
But others segregated themselves into new communities. They would settle in cities that knew no straight lines, right angles, or lacked red.
4
3
Replying to
Some have lost specific numbers. Zero, One and Two form the most significant and different groups, with three or more lumped under "other".
1
1
Replying to
Two: no duality. There can be no relationship without a mediator or capstone of some sort. There is always Yin, Yang and the Other.
Replying to
One: no unity. No identity. Nothing exists except in relation to another. Nothing is singular. They don't even have a definite article.
1
1
1
Replying to
Zero: no absence. No empty space. No thing has a beginning or end, it forms a continuum through time, only with the occasional phase change.
2