All we knew was that the virus acted very specifically: it took out an idea, excised it from the mind, and left a taboo in its stead.
Conversation
Replying to
Those affected became unable to think certain thoughts: if they so much as resembled the killed idea, they fizzled.
1
1
Replying to
Philosophy grew a new branch: Much like neurologists learn about the brain by studying specific lesions, they now examined ontologies.
1
1
Replying to
Mathematicians created new formalisms and a calculus of minds: Some were now utterly incompatible, requiring a mediator chosen by algorithm.
1
2
Replying to
The ontotypical mainstream consisted of people whose minds had taken only grazing hits. Still, language adapted in fascinating ways. Had to.
1
2
Replying to
But others segregated themselves into new communities. They would settle in cities that knew no straight lines, right angles, or lacked red.
Replying to
The dream of the great unifying theory, the cathedral, was destroyed. In its place, we built many small temples. Babel.
Replying to
Those who do not conceptualize time
Those who do not know forward
Those who do not perceive borders between things
They are, in a way, free.
1
1
Replying to
The borderless have never learnt to count, for all is one inseparable. They are masters of shapes, everything they build fits in its place.
1
Show replies
Replying to
Some have lost specific numbers. Zero, One and Two form the most significant and different groups, with three or more lumped under "other".
1
1
Replying to
Two: no duality. There can be no relationship without a mediator or capstone of some sort. There is always Yin, Yang and the Other.
1
1
Show replies
Replying to
Finding the right community is a journey: How do two people find out to lack the same idea if they cannot articulate it or even think it?
1
2
Replying to
You wander the land, are the guest of many tribes, exchange stories, and leave when it turns out the things you can't think are different.
1
1
Show replies