how to rationalize X for maximum hilarity
Conversation
Replying to
@_100101890 I was more referring to outlines of shadows that became tangible, for example.
1
1
1
Replying to
@_100101890 (I am cataloguing story archetypes of the kind that fit into tweets here)
1
2
Replying to
ah gotcha. Well, I was kind of making a suggestion more than interpreting - so they fit together, potentially.
1
Replying to
@_100101890 You know it is pretty hard to come up with original confusions here. For example: numbers that bleed back into the real world.
Replying to
@_100101890 Many people, when confronted with the number 5, think of 5 apples instead of "five". How am I supposed to put a twist on that?