'(·)@allgebrah·Jan 23, 2016Replying to @allgebrahwhat if X could/were/made/contained/?? Y what if they wouldn't15
'(·)@allgebrah·Jan 26, 2016Replying to @allgebrahwhat if [part of map] were [part of territory] instead28
Armitage@__________1890·Jan 26, 2016Replying to @allgebrah@allgebrah schemata that should be uniformly expressible as diagrams?1
'(·)@allgebrah·Jan 26, 2016Replying to @__________1890@_100101890 I was more referring to outlines of shadows that became tangible, for example.111
'(·)@allgebrah·Jan 26, 2016Replying to @allgebrah@_100101890 (I am cataloguing story archetypes of the kind that fit into tweets here)12
Armitage@__________1890·Jan 26, 2016Replying to @allgebrah@allgebrah ah gotcha. Well, I was kind of making a suggestion more than interpreting - so they fit together, potentially.1
'(·)@allgebrahReplying to @__________1890@_100101890 the things that are their own maps10:11 PM · Jan 26, 2016·Twitter Web Client1 Retweet1 Like
'(·)@allgebrah·Jan 26, 2016Replying to @allgebrah@_100101890 You know it is pretty hard to come up with original confusions here. For example: numbers that bleed back into the real world.11
'(·)@allgebrah·Jan 26, 2016Replying to @allgebrah@_100101890 Many people, when confronted with the number 5, think of 5 apples instead of "five". How am I supposed to put a twist on that?