Though I have no memory of making it, I think this diagrams generative cruelty in the circuit of matter and thought.
Conversation
Replying to
I called this kind of schema a 'fireline'...definitely had used it elsewhere...
*sigh* there's probably a faded key scrawled on some receipt
2
1
Replying to
@276039081 Do you have a repository of these because I collect pattern languages? Or will you be my guinea pig when mine takes form?
2
2
Replying to
no. unfortunately. I can actually tell a fair amount about this one, tho. (Food helps haha)
1
Replying to
if it's useful at all: the dotted axis is an asymptotic boundary; see behavior of the dotted curves [paths]. They're spun out >
1
1
Replying to
> from the concept-(/)circuit (of) Matter/Thought ['T' above, 'M' below]. Circuit elements [-->] are M:T T:M M:M, but there may >
2
Replying to
@276039081 ah now I get why your tweets have all these brackets and parens!
1
Replying to
@276039081 It is a kind of synesthesia where concepts have form that overlays on the text (concurrent synesthesia because what else is text)
1
3
3
Replying to
yes. Though I've only 'seen it' as/in a full conscious effect on read text, eg. bolded/'floating' wh- pronouns and prefixes, 2-3X
2
Replying to
@276039081 to me it encourages reparsing of the sentence, not so much boldening but a notation for conceptual ambiguity
Replying to
syntactic switches and loops, yup. Explicit visual-selection FX are always transient, but I think it's how I can flash-parse text