Conversation

Replying to

story is the wrong word. It's neither linear, coherent nor expressible in words. example: situational memory, multiple personalities.

Replying to

Few stories are linear and coherent and expressible in words. Multiple personalities are just that: multiple stories.

Replying to

Stories are expressible in words by definition. Maybe you meant the events themselves?

Replying to

Words can merely conjure stories, not express them.

Replying to

Just to make sure we have our definitions down: are stories narratives (=superimposed on a number of occurrences) or something else?

Replying to

partially ordered mental representations with a top-level event structure and motivational relevance

Replying to

Then this still doesn't accommodate for the "living in several timelines" that brains do. psychogenic blindness, split brain patients

Replying to

Multiple selfs then, dissocistion, and imperfect cohesion.

Replying to

Yes but are we still using the right abstraction then? Or is it a hyperstory?

Replying to

No, I mean that if we are telling multiple, non-integrated stories, we literally have multiple selfs.

'(·)

@allgebrah

Replying to

@Plinz

They usually reintegrate into a greater whole in seconds. Anyway I think we should take this to email or meatspace at c3 or so.

9:52 PM · Dec 8, 2015Twitter Web Client

Likes