Joscha Bach@Plinz·Dec 5, 2015You are not your brain. You are a story that your brain tells itself.54773
'(·)@allgebrah·Dec 5, 2015Replying to @Plinz@Plinz story is the wrong word. It's neither linear, coherent nor expressible in words. example: situational memory, multiple personalities.11
Joscha Bach@Plinz·Dec 5, 2015Replying to @allgebrah@allgebrah Few stories are linear and coherent and expressible in words. Multiple personalities are just that: multiple stories.21
'(·)@allgebrah·Dec 5, 2015Replying to @Plinz@Plinz Stories are expressible in words by definition. Maybe you meant the events themselves?1
Joscha Bach@Plinz·Dec 5, 2015Replying to @allgebrah@allgebrah Words can merely conjure stories, not express them.1
'(·)@allgebrah·Dec 5, 2015Replying to @Plinz@Plinz Just to make sure we have our definitions down: are stories narratives (=superimposed on a number of occurrences) or something else?11
Joscha Bach@Plinz·Dec 6, 2015Replying to @allgebrah@allgebrah partially ordered mental representations with a top-level event structure and motivational relevance21
'(·)@allgebrah·Dec 6, 2015Replying to @Plinz@Plinz Then this still doesn't accommodate for the "living in several timelines" that brains do. psychogenic blindness, split brain patients2
Joscha Bach@Plinz·Dec 6, 2015Replying to @allgebrah@allgebrah Multiple selfs then, dissocistion, and imperfect cohesion.11
'(·)@allgebrahReplying to @Plinz@Plinz Yes but are we still using the right abstraction then? Or is it a hyperstory?6:29 PM · Dec 6, 2015·Twitter Web Client
Joscha Bach@Plinz·Dec 7, 2015Replying to @allgebrah@allgebrah No, I mean that if we are telling multiple, non-integrated stories, we literally have multiple selfs.11
'(·)@allgebrah·Dec 8, 2015Replying to @Plinz@Plinz They usually reintegrate into a greater whole in seconds. Anyway I think we should take this to email or meatspace at c3 or so.2