@cupe_cupe Please don't pull a Godwin on me. You know that ATTAC has been called antisemitic for criticizing finance ethics? @umruehren
-
-
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz@umruehren Was meant as an Illustration of the unintended effect the usage has, no other comparison intended.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cupe_cupe
@cupe_cupe What is a better term for the same group? (but since I am not a social constructionist, I'm not sure it matters)@umruehren2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
'(·) Retweeted '(·)
@Plinz@cupe_cupe@umruehren The best I know so far are "internet activist" and "Offended Person". cf.https://twitter.com/allgebrah/status/652799274770649088 …'(·) added,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah At this point, I suspect the correct classification might be social constructionist leftist?@cupe_cupe@umruehren1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz@cupe_cupe@umruehren leftist is overfitting it imo.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah What do you have in mind?@cupe_cupe@umruehren2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz@cupe_cupe@umruehren http://www.synkretie.net/writings/Der%20feministische%20Diskurs%20auf%20dem%20c3%20-%20eine%20Ontologie.html … but translated to GG.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah this only describes the spectrum from: "really cares" to "does not give a shit"@cupe_cupe@umruehren1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz@cupe_cupe@umruehren spectrum from "needs to vent" to "prefers experience over debate". e.g. I do give a shit but won't take sides.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Plinz @cupe_cupe @umruehren Or rather, this approach offers me a side to take (that of the non-offended), the others don't (all sides suck)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.