again, using that word is like trying to appear unprejudiced while saying "world jew conspiracy" debating finance ethics
Conversation
Replying to
Please don't pull a Godwin on me. You know that ATTAC has been called antisemitic for criticizing finance ethics?
1
Replying to
Was meant as an Illustration of the unintended effect the usage has, no other comparison intended.
2
Replying to
What is a better term for the same group? (but since I am not a social constructionist, I'm not sure it matters)
2
Replying to
The best I know so far are "internet activist" and "Offended Person". cf.
Quote Tweet
Is there a more succinct term for "Person Who Is Offended On The Internet"?
2
Replying to
At this point, I suspect the correct classification might be social constructionist leftist?
1
Replying to
this only describes the spectrum from: "really cares" to "does not give a shit"
1
Replying to
spectrum from "needs to vent" to "prefers experience over debate". e.g. I do give a shit but won't take sides.
Replying to
I disagree. "Experience over debate" means that you don't care about content, only entertainment.
1
Replying to
I care and have a lot to say on it but little is original. Mostly sensible and boring. So I keep quiet.
1
1
Show replies
Replying to
Or rather, this approach offers me a side to take (that of the non-offended), the others don't (all sides suck)