Conversation

Replying to
kind of rich of someone with a trans flag in their screen name to insist on using someone's wallet name when they specifically and very visibly requested otherwise
1
4
Replying to
I call people by their preferred names no matter their reasons, they don't need to show me their spent leuprorelin injectors or estradiol patches to qualify for it
2
2
Replying to and
So you're acknowledging that he now publicly uses the name "Scott Siskind", but asserting that he would prefer people continue to refer to him as "Scott Alexander"? Am I understanding your point correctly? Surely if he had such a preference he'd have said so in "Still Alive"?
1
1
You don't need to be trans to experiment with identity, or you might be trans but an egg and think "trans" doesn't apply to you. Allowing people to use chosen names and to not punish them is to enable that sort of experimentation, and boy did I have many names and genders
2
Replying to
I have no disagreement with any of that. And I think the NYT made the wrong call when they insisted on publishing Scott's last name. But none of that explains why it's wrong to call someone by the name they use when publicly stating "my name is..." without caveat.
1
1
Show replies