Tech bros: Data is totally objective, machine learning is never biased Medical bot: Ehh if you're not a dude you're probably just imagining that heart attackhttps://twitter.com/DrMurphy11/status/1170774525987971076 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
As long as the diagnoses-by-bot don't feed back into the studies that inform those bots, the diagnoses will converge towards correctness. If they do though, then yes that's an obvious problem. But I don't see any evidence of that in the cited thread, am I missing wider context?
interestingly, the way the cited study (https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.012307 …) was set up, if such a bot influenced whether people showed up, the next installment of that study would show even greater similarities between men and women
The tool is literally a differential diagnosis tool. That is what it does. Like that’s the point. Those are sold to doctors
Assume I know all of what you just told me. Assume I also know that even a trained doctor will often opt for the easier way of consulting the computer, and that this can be a problem. What reasons could I have to be non-alarmist about this?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.