Conversation

Relates to a thing I was wondering about: suppose a process runs for time T before terminating and we know distribution of T. What can we infer about internals of system knowing nothing other than this distribution? If not exponential can we can infer it has some internal state
3
10
Another example: a non-exponential failure time for a machine tells you its state is changing, eg. from wear and tear. Exponential suggests (to me at least) wear-and-tear isn't the issue.
3
5
Replying to
exponential would suggest to me that the system is okay within a few σ from the design optimum and only very rarely and randomly enters a danger/damage zone
1
1
Replying to and
fixed time would mean there's a quantity being used up internally, then the "early or late" failure pattern of hard disks implies a number of bad apples, etc
1
Replying to
If we have exponential systems and we wait for first part to fail, we get exponential. If it can survive a % of fails > 0, it's non-exponential. Consistent with memory idea - the set of failed parts comprise the "memory".
2