Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to and
Are you saying that all ideas are ideologies? When I was 12, I had lots of ideas how people should relate to each other, but they were wholly inconsistent, mostly random, and not a major part of any extant ideology.
1
Replying to and
Me, too. The older I get the more it appears to be that there is no single set of values, rules and policies that is guaranteed to yield the best outcomes, and that adherence to individual political camps is inversely correlated with agency over one's understanding.
1
Replying to and
Most people would agree that some individuals are more rigid ideologues than others, which seems to be a dimension independent of having ideas about society. In that case, it is logically inconsistent to believe that everything is ideology.
1
Replying to and
The most rigid ideologues I encountered had very few *original* ideas about society — their ideas were wholly borrowed from others. An idea becomes a part of an ideology only when it reaches a certain point where it becomes transmitted as a “meme complex.”
1
3
Replying to and
It’s not that an idea is being transmitted that makes it an ideology— It’s that it is being transmitted *whole,* with few modifications, sort of how a viral DNA retrotransposon is transmitted from parent to offspring, and when modifications do happen, they are often random.
1
Show replies
Replying to
Ideology is not the same as political thinking. Usually it is the opposite: the hivemind expresses its thoughts in the host. If the host has their own thoughts that don't channel the telos of the hivemind, the host gets in trouble.
1
1
Replying to and
I think we can follow Napoleon and split political thinking into 1) realist (willing to make deals, etc) and 2) ideological (rigid, uncompromising).