My Wednesday column: The Redistribution of Sex, which apparently has many readers on this platform already:https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/opinion/incels-sex-robots-redistribution.html …
-
-
I always get a kick out of the “respectable” right trying to cast far-right kookery as somehow “radical” or leftist,” when said kookery is just their own views taken to their absurd conclusions.
-
Just so we’re clear: incels and “sex redistribution” isn’t about sexual liberation or ‘60s style “free love.” It’s a reactionary, revanchist pining for a world where men are “owed” sex and women’s consent is irrelevant.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But that wouldn't sow enough confusion and misdirection! (The ultimate point of communication!) Or at least, it wouldn't get as much viral attention...
-
Also, most people don't get paid for a single tweet, whereas this bullshit article netted him a paycheck.
-
In that case, I respect his hustle
-
And that is where you and I differ.
-
There is, unfortunately, a booming market for bad takes and unnecessary opinon columns...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.