"intellectual dark web" really about overton fragmentation, maximize safe exposure by being between "acceptable" and "radical" on large opposing group's window
-
-
This is still so meta. Isn’t the point the spectrum of possible ideas? There’s a space of people talking. Who do you tend to agree with philosophically, and why? When you’re really thinking, who’s edgy vs who’s conventional isn’t how you consider arguments.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure, but Jordan Peterson actually has a message. And maybe his message is hilariously conventional, but why are people gravitating to it? Apparently it’s sorely needed! And the fact that he’s viciously attacked for being…conventional?


nuts, but that’s why he’s famous -
he should be attacked for his stupid mysticism and religious quackery
-
saying to a bunch of trans no and parrot boomer politics, knowing enough about the heritability of political views to start an online psedo-cult for ppl w/ daddy issues and cash in is enough to get the leftists jurnos angry and make you a 21st cent Rosa Parks for conservatives
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
She had to coin the over-the-top "intellectual dark web" to invent a story where there was none beyond "Internet enables crappy debates in which people either say, infer, or are inferred to have said nasty things; one side is always less popular."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.