There’s not close to the power you need to meaningfully detect an interaction. I mean even if you didn’t know anything about the size of the GSS it’s obvious from getting 0% celibacy for women.
-
-
FWIW, this is what the age-adjusted %s look like for "not at all" sexually active. Doesn't look like Lyman's
#s.pic.twitter.com/UhN3eFsS75
-
can i just say this belongs in the hall of fame of autistic data-crunching blogger charts that are inadvertently meta-art
-
'lowess malecel year' im dying
-
it's the duchamp toilet for our times
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why contribute to a culture that doesn't care about legitimate evidence unless you want others to feel the same way?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel that way too at times, but looking around it does seem like there’s enough of a critical mass to build something better.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.