I looked at the partner count sample for basically this same group on Monday and it was decently large so I’m surprised the sexual frequency question is such a low N, unless it was a result of conditioning on marriage.
-
-
so once I accepted it was futile I started going blast fishing from time to time, half out of spite, half because it's funny, and I don't feel anyone can blame me for this
-
FWIW, this is what the age-adjusted %s look like for "not at all" sexually active. Doesn't look like Lyman's
#s.pic.twitter.com/UhN3eFsS75
-
can i just say this belongs in the hall of fame of autistic data-crunching blogger charts that are inadvertently meta-art
-
'lowess malecel year' im dying
-
it's the duchamp toilet for our times
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.