What happened? https://twitter.com/lymanstoneky/status/991810342589206531 …
-
-
then if it gets shared enough it becomes a new planetoid around which the discourse revolves for a few days to a week
-
dozens of blue journalists and cultural commentators across the globe are suddenly forced to write 1-2k words about how it's definitely not true and if it is it doesn't matter anyway
-
and maybe a few academics see it and are like "huh that might be something to look into for real?" and a few years later they publish and no one notices but esoteric graphpoaster accounts
-
Even if true, it encourages norms where people perceive outgroups to be playing fast and loose with the facts, which likely further erodes quality of discourse
-
I'm just a simple fisherman undone by the sense of dread brought upon watching for years all my colleagues switch to bottom-trawling while I frantically warned about dwindling stocks
-
so once I accepted it was futile I started going blast fishing from time to time, half out of spite, half because it's funny, and I don't feel anyone can blame me for this
-
FWIW, this is what the age-adjusted %s look like for "not at all" sexually active. Doesn't look like Lyman's
#s.pic.twitter.com/UhN3eFsS75
-
can i just say this belongs in the hall of fame of autistic data-crunching blogger charts that are inadvertently meta-art
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ah, but I’m saying that it’s not meaningful for anything. In the same way that your typical N=24 research should get less attention rather than reframed as additional evidence that should get a little weight
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.