there's this thing in constructing dependency trees of sentences I've been calling the pajama problem
-
-
"I [sbj] house in robber [obj] shoot [past]" = me in house robber outside, vs "I [sbj] robber [obj] house in shoot [past]" or "(I [subj] robber [obj]) house in shoot [past]"
Show this thread -
incidentally the original intent of parens was to denote whole clauses used as modifiers and to group modifiers themselves
Show this thread -
I was gonna commasep but then someone pointed out "oh neat how would you do 'or'?" so god help me I might use & and |
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
to do this properly would require constructing parse trees or whatever but
i
shot an
elephant in my pajamas
i
shot an
elephant
in my pajamas
i in my pajamas
shot an
elephant
-
which is all to say, i like the idea
-
yea I stole it from a joakim nivre paper
-
specifically he was restricting his problem domain to sentences with projective dependencies and I was like "oh hey I could just... make the whole language do that"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.