Awkward NRx insight: Fascist lunacy is far better tailored to popular acceptance than NRx. ...
-
-
personally I don't think we're getting anything better without a few decades of anarchy and bloodshed, eventually people w ill take order as a terminal value
-
Nothing is going to collapse in any meaningful way. The highest technology the Romans had was the arch. We have way more than that. It's too far down to be considered collapse. What will happen are islands of competence in a sea of dysfunction.
-
I think slow decline is more likely than sudden implosion but to assert our technological advancement *precludes* it is asinine
-
increasing complexity entails increasing fragility. when complex societies fall apart, people invariably fall back on simpler forms
-
also neither of the examples I gave were collapses, they were periods of intense strife followed by top-down reorganization
-
if you want collapse look to the disintegration of the mycenean palace economies or the crisis of the third century
-
The past was defined by alternating periods of expansion and contraction, but all times suffering was present. The future is defined by alternating periods of expansion and contraction, with delusion-inducing levels of luxury present at all times.
-
trade networks don't secure themselves, it requires hegemonic power and a highly specialized labor force capable of operating systematically
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.