to "we do this because the fact that we do it is sacrosanct and it must be defended at all costs"
-
-
likewise arguments for expanding franchise, direct election of senators, etc were partly moral but partly technological, that people were overall better informed than in previous eras
Show this thread -
and thus it was safe and reasonable to throw off fetters placed on the voting mechanic very specifically to guard against public insanity or foolishness
Show this thread -
-
what so much of the discourse about facebook/cambridge analytica/muh russians/etc misses is that maybe this speaks to a failure of the system to remain robust
Show this thread -
if it is possible to accurately predict a voter's decision and to craft messaging to change that decision from basic demographic information and a five-dimensional personality test
Show this thread -
maybe entrusting decisionmaking authority to them in the first place is something worth considering the merits of
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.