but that's the sort of thing I *would* expect an organization like nyt to be highly (relative to competitors) reliable on, and a completely separate concern from agenda/worldview issue
NR modus was basically to operate as a center-right schelling point and blackball anyone who didn't keep within the bounds they set on "conservatism"
-
-
this let them and their wives get invited to the nice liberal cocktail parties but wasn't especially effective for accomplishing policy goals
-
a lot of the discourse from people further right in leadup to trump primary victory was about breaking NR acceptability firewall, and in that basically succeeded
-
but a free for all is not desirable and ostracizing crazies is generally good, the task imo would be to define a new schelling point and gatekeep it, but pick something that actually works
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Right, that's in line with the articles I've read. I never really sought it out, but occasionally I've followed links.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.