libs are right that those outlets are *less true* than their own. the appeal of them is that they *feel* right
-
-
the important thing is to have a coherent ethos that inspires participants in the endeavor, one that incentivizes reliability/integrity and also fulfillment of purpose
Show this thread -
ethos becomes the basis from which one constructs a counternarrative which resolves dissonance without sacrificing grounding in reality
Show this thread -
it's easy for libs to dismiss fox et al on factual grounds because fox is stupid. you know you succeeded when you replicate msmism in them
Show this thread -
where all the factual ducks seem to be in order but the conclusions inspire an intangible sense of dread and wrongness, like their media does to the other half
Show this thread -
for obvious reasons (the entire ecosystem is unwinding lol) I can't say I would recommend founding a media institution in the current year but
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
well except there's a lack of non-left wing people who are basically competent and intelligent yet basic enough to go into mainstream journalism
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i mean, i like this idea. but one could say that market stratification might make this goal hard to reach. we already have Blue Media and Red Media and this relies on enough mindshare sick of both for buy-in
-
but don't get me wrong, Would Contribute
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't think that's the structures we're going to get. Those organisations are built around the medium of the newspaper, bundling news due to delivery costs. The growth is all in smaller publications/individuals.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.