but the results are similar and I don't think the characterization of the results is too inaccurate. but that's not the point
-
-
but that's the sort of thing I *would* expect an organization like nyt to be highly (relative to competitors) reliable on, and a completely separate concern from agenda/worldview issue
Show this thread -
imo it would be entirely possible to build a right-wing media institution/ecosystem that is comparably reliable to nyt on things nyt is reliable on, but which resolves msmism dissonance
Show this thread -
the important thing is to have a coherent ethos that inspires participants in the endeavor, one that incentivizes reliability/integrity and also fulfillment of purpose
Show this thread -
ethos becomes the basis from which one constructs a counternarrative which resolves dissonance without sacrificing grounding in reality
Show this thread -
it's easy for libs to dismiss fox et al on factual grounds because fox is stupid. you know you succeeded when you replicate msmism in them
Show this thread -
where all the factual ducks seem to be in order but the conclusions inspire an intangible sense of dread and wrongness, like their media does to the other half
Show this thread -
for obvious reasons (the entire ecosystem is unwinding lol) I can't say I would recommend founding a media institution in the current year but
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
Ironically,most media was vastly duplicitous about Trump's odds of winning while giving him loads of "free stuff"; valuable air time. By early 2016, I was sure he'd win GOP nomination. Was seeing a false reality torus that acted like invalid mentation is a giant NOP. T'aint so.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.