I don't understand why people think the ability to clone people into videos will have more of an effect than the ability to clone people into photos has hadhttps://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/bjye8a/reddit-fake-porn-app-daisy-ridley …
-
Show this thread
-
Is this technology easier to use than Photoshop and its ilk, and that's the difference that I'm missing? More accessible to any random person?
5 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @sonyaellenmann
it's because basically everyone alive takes for granted that audio and video are unimpeachable proof of something by virtue of their complexity
6 replies 1 retweet 26 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @sonyaellenmann
plenty still think this way about images probably. like there's tons of people who didn't grow up in online communities where such things were everyday, and...
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @sonyaellenmann
...so don't have the "is this a shop" reflex, but there's still many esp older people who still haven't integrated into their model of reality that such things are possible
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @sonyaellenmann
oh man, to some degree this is even still true of written words describing something specifically
4 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
yea this is def true, all it takes is the general visual style that has come to define "news website" to fool most people
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.