I don't understand why people think the ability to clone people into videos will have more of an effect than the ability to clone people into photos has hadhttps://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/bjye8a/reddit-fake-porn-app-daisy-ridley …
-
Show this thread
-
Is this technology easier to use than Photoshop and its ilk, and that's the difference that I'm missing? More accessible to any random person?
5 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @sonyaellenmann
it's because basically everyone alive takes for granted that audio and video are unimpeachable proof of something by virtue of their complexity
6 replies 1 retweet 26 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @sonyaellenmann
plenty still think this way about images probably. like there's tons of people who didn't grow up in online communities where such things were everyday, and...
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @sonyaellenmann
...so don't have the "is this a shop" reflex, but there's still many esp older people who still haven't integrated into their model of reality that such things are possible
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @sonyaellenmann
the "takes for granted" thing is important in that it's experiential and more feeling than reasoning, like I'm sure fake audio/video is intensely disturbing to many, not simply troubling
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @sonyaellenmann
and the moral panic types writing about this stuff operate off that feeling of wrongness, the fear of it
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
because the thing they always forget is authoritative audio/video has barely existed for more than a century and we got along fine before it
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.