weird how basically no living "modern artist" will be immortalized in the canon of art history but anime will be
-
-
and it's a singular style in which many work, readily identifiable and with its own conventions, which makes it coherent to describe as a movement
-
I once read someone argue that comic books might’ve been what kept representational art alive during the 20th century. (Tbf, this was in a comic book — the artist drew himself as the narrator saying this in front of the Guggenheim museum)
-
Comics are shit lol rt
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seriously though? You’re cherry picking quite a bit. A shocking amount of modern anime is idol garbage aimed at draining the pockets of lonely NEETs
-
yea and a shocking amount of oil painting was minor aristocrats showing off bitches and bling
-
and I was just coming up with a "contemporary art greatest hits" off the top of my head, the things I think people who like this stuff think is good
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hmmm. There's plenty of contempory New Zealand art that has an unironic sense of beauty. Maybe you're ignoring art that's growing out of indigenous cultures in the west? As anime has in the east (he said at a guess).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.