Is cannibalism wrong, immoral, or unethical if it doesn't involve people being *intentionally* killed?
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @sonyaellenmann
everyone replying to this doesn't understand why it's traditionally considered "wrong" in the first place
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @sonyaellenmann
consent or agency has nothing to do with it, it's a violation of purity norms
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy
Yeah but purity norms don't develop for no reason
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @sonyaellenmann
I could speculate on origins, but there's an important distinction between harm (rape, murder) and purity (cannibalism, incest) norms
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @sonyaellenmann
it isn't important that there isn't a "victim" given mutual consent (people who argue about prion disease or inbred children miss the point)
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Replying to @alicemazzy @sonyaellenmann
it is simply that these acts defile those who participate in them
12:26 AM - 14 Jan 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.