the nuance these articles always miss is "supremacy" in term is colloquially taken as "innate superiority" but idpol types mean it as "social preeminence"
-
-
For integrating. (Fleeing has obvious costs.)
-
the most quantatively verifiable is race is correlated with socioeconomic status, which directly determines school quality
-
segregation vs integration covers like a quarter of the SAT race gap afaik. fuzzier things like acculturation to white middle class norms also likely but hard to measure
-
That's not integration. 1) whiter neighborhoods tend to have higher property prices 2) blacks in those areas are richer than average
-
and of course 3) richer families have better test scores
-
school districts are drawn for political reasons just like anything else and there are plenty that cover multiple de facto segregated communities
-
I'm not sure what you're arguing, that minorities almost universally prefer integrated schools because it's a status symbol?
-
The research I've done led to my position that school integration lowered average school performance vs a counterfactual no integration.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.