the nuance these articles always miss is "supremacy" in term is colloquially taken as "innate superiority" but idpol types mean it as "social preeminence"
-
-
Replying to @alicemazzy
for instance a 2016 article arguing to call spencer et al "white nationalist" but not "white supremacist" because latter term covers all of USG
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alicemazzy
many leftists don't even appreciate the distinction in their side's own definition and conflates the terms or use as generic invective
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alicemazzy
so someone (ie most americans) operating off the first definition see those using the second as making claims that are patently absurd
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
this is what I would guess is the underlying reason of why it is treadmilling so fast
8:34 PM - 24 Oct 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.