part of the reason sf has no housing is absurd height restrictions but I guess they even ban adding to buildings under the limits
-
-
Show this thread
-
sf is the "some people's purpose in life is just to serve as a warning for others" of cities
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The OP mis-states 162-16, which allowed construction of in-law and other units without additional permitting. https://sfgov.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2739832&GUID=5B77577A-FDF1-43FA-86DF-ADACCE135D93 …
-
oh, so it seems like the ordinance allowed ADU construction where before it was banned, but only as standalone structures or within the existing building envelope?
-
Exactly, ADUs req'd add'l permitting before & 162-16 got rid of that. But expanding building envelope still requires permitting
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.