or, alternatively: they exploited him while they could and then dumped in a ditch after he stopped being productive
-
-
Replying to @whitequark @scanlime and
they themselves admit he was singlehandedly responsible to the success of the company, and then that they sit and did nothing watching him…
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @whitequark @scanlime and
burn out while they could still milk a bit more productivity then, poof. a very common story except most people don't pat themselves on back
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @whitequark @scanlime and
the story of "how we fired a guy and here's our justification" is necessarily biased and one-sided, we have no idea whether it's accurate
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @0xdeadbabe @whitequark and
as a tangential aside, the implicit subtext of the whole thing is a "no real" entry in the "10x dev real/no real" argument
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
fits perfectly mold of "no dev is vastly more productive than peers, just illusion of egomaniac creating whirlwind of tech debt" etc etc
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.