it hadn't occurred to me that pepe is protected by copyright, kinda fucked up tbh
-
-
the onus is on each third party to demonstrate fair use applies in their particular case, and getting sued is expensive even if you can win
-
whereas if for whatever a reason a work were not covered by copyright, the creator would not have standing to sue in the first place
-
and second, "parody" is using another's work to comment on or criticize the work itself, the permissibility of which is well established
-
but "satire" is using the work to comment on something else and is afforded no protection (see campbell v. acuffrose and cases that cite it)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
son u dumb
-
Tweet unavailable
-
maybe you should take the 2nd day of beginner law
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.