under the Sanders bill can you provide healthcare without being a Healthcare Provider? surely yes, right?
-
-
but the reason they oppose supplemental insurance is fear of ghettoizing the public option
-
if it were an option and not something that everyone is required to pay into that would maybe make sense, but
-
I could see how it'd provide an incentive to shunt unusual/expensive procedures into the private market as a cost-saving measure
-
that would happen anyway, except you'd be screwed even if you had money
-
yea but that's not the point, we're privileging equality over efficacy in this frame
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.