Random convo I had w/ @calebwatney recently: what explains the fact that sculpture hasn't improved as an art in ~500 years, but movies have?
-
-
Oh we don't disagree! I wouldn't make the argument that Michaelangelo is the apex I would say I'm hard pressed to find modern comparisons
-
oh I'm not disputing that at all, responding to "500 years" not with "wtf sculpture rules now" but with "150 years"
-
Ah, right. I should have been so arbitrary with the timeline. (Also there's some Caravaggio in the Nat. Gallery rn & it's amazing)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
if we're judging by technical difficulty the 18th century ones are certainly "better", but people don't actually judge art that way
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.