Are you saying a social network has no right to create its own idea of a positive customer experience?I don’t see it too different from spam
-
-
Replying to @sun_has_set
I think you're misunderstanding, OP is mad that facebook decided not to do said filtering
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy
I apologize. You mean you agree that FB should filter fake news regardless of which party gets disproportionately affected as a result?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sun_has_set
facebook can do whatever it wants, I just think it's laughable for some bluecheck lib to present it as a moral imperative
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @sun_has_set
especially since such a change if it had been made would have benefited his chosen candidate
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @sun_has_set
The fact that blocking weaponized bullshit favors one candidate isn't FB's problem. Running on weaponized bullshit is the candidate's choice
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Moreover, no person or media company is under any obligation to make the world easier for campaigns that decide to go this route.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
They are, however, obliged to manage conflicts between their short term and long term interests. And that's where FB has fucked up royally.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexqgb @sun_has_set
the fact that the other side is buttmad over "weaponized bullshit" isn't their problem either
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
facebook is an advertising platform that happens to provide a social network
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
their ultimate goal is to maximize viewership and thus probably view this in terms of alienating users
-
-
versus towing the line of prog causes that are popular in the media
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.