til manipulating information streams to get your favored candidate elected is putting your country over your personal interestshttps://twitter.com/Mikel_Jollett/status/905573584550092800 …
I think you're misunderstanding, OP is mad that facebook decided not to do said filtering
-
-
I apologize. You mean you agree that FB should filter fake news regardless of which party gets disproportionately affected as a result?
-
facebook can do whatever it wants, I just think it's laughable for some bluecheck lib to present it as a moral imperative
-
especially since such a change if it had been made would have benefited his chosen candidate
-
The fact that blocking weaponized bullshit favors one candidate isn't FB's problem. Running on weaponized bullshit is the candidate's choice
-
Moreover, no person or media company is under any obligation to make the world easier for campaigns that decide to go this route.
-
They are, however, obliged to manage conflicts between their short term and long term interests. And that's where FB has fucked up royally.
-
the fact that the other side is buttmad over "weaponized bullshit" isn't their problem either
-
facebook is an advertising platform that happens to provide a social network
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.