no. you seem to be confused about my intent
-
-
Replying to @alicemazzy @IvyShoots
I'm not citing quoted post's (apparently false) content as evidence of anything, I'm criticizing the poster's mindset
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy
The words you chose convey the point that "all sides" are the same in intent and motivation. False equivalency in response to fake evidence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IvyShoots
not sure how it's a "false equivalency" to suggest all sides seek to advance the interests of their respective side
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy
Not what you said. "Icons" aren't an "interest" anti-fascists seek to advance. At the moment, only white supremacists want that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IvyShoots @alicemazzy
You claimed false equivalency between the 2 sides' "interest" in icons, based on a false story about a non-existent "lefist" icon.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IvyShoots
this is a fair point. there is some clamoring to install more left-palatable icons when these sorts of controversies arise but...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alicemazzy
I appreciate you conceding that point. I've been watching left and right tactics for a long time, the right lies MUCH more than the left.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @alicemazzy
You also seem very intelligent and educated. Maybe naive not to realize that being neutral about good vs evil is de facto siding with evil.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I "sided with good" for quite awhile before deciding things weren't so simple
-
-
Replying to @alicemazzy
Hope you come to realize the perfect is the enemy of the good before too long.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.