unironically mad at everyone opining that waving a flag qualifies as "incitement"
-
-
Replying to @alicemazzy
the brandenburg test is whether speech is directed at inciting lawless action that is both imminent and likely
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy
if you're going to play conlaw professor at least go for fighting words doctrine jfc
1 reply 2 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy
Twitter conlaw kit: Chaplinsky, Emoluments Clause, er...Marshall of the Supreme Court.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
don't forget ignorance of precedent underlying citizens united
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @i_contemplate_
oh and arguing "prior art" in the context of copyright
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @alicemazzy @i_contemplate_
militia means 2A guarantees the military the right to bear arms
10:37 AM - 15 Aug 2017
1 reply
0 retweets
2 likes
-
-
Replying to @alicemazzy
interstate commerce -> selling milk to your neighbors from your own farm. Oh wait, that's actually Wickard v Filburn!
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.