Causality is not shown through anecdote. Perhaps the narrative is true. Don't see strong relation to current situation, though.
-
-
Keep reading. Alice is trying to construct an ahistorical narrative with the two graphs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Keep reading where?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Wibberrrrrrr128 💻 🖥️ 🖱️ Retweeted Faruk Ateş, Supernova
This thread cites its sources, for startershttps://twitter.com/KuraFire/status/894378360041684992 …
Wibberrrrrrr128 💻 🖥️ 🖱️ added,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wibrr @CrecusLohe and
Actually, just look at
@alicemazzy’s major flaw: chart on the left is women as % compared to men, not hard numbers. Rebranding’s irrelevant.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KuraFire @CrecusLohe and
Unless Alice is arguing that the rebranding occurred for women entering CompSci but it didn’t occur for men doing the same, in which case…pic.twitter.com/g0ODLZTJXp
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
both charts are percentage women, I'm not sure what your point is
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @KuraFire and
unless you mean women weren't actually "forced out", just large male influx
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @KuraFire and
Ah yes, this is exactly what a totally neutral "male influx" would look like, no whiff of sexism here! Just 100% egalitarianism...pic.twitter.com/oMe9nf2Ic2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
incidentally why is it that every time you're tweeting at me it's to spout some feminist talking point or another
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I was an sj type a few years ago, I've heard all this stuff before. it's just tedious
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.