Even if I did it still doesn't seem to explain current situation (which is the issue at hand, after all).
-
-
You really really really need to listen to interviews with the "computer girls" who lived thru that period. It's no hoodwink.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Causality is not shown through anecdote. Perhaps the narrative is true. Don't see strong relation to current situation, though.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Keep reading. Alice is trying to construct an ahistorical narrative with the two graphs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Keep reading where?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Wibberrrrrrr128 💻 🖥️ 🖱️ Retweeted Faruk Ateş, Supernova
This thread cites its sources, for startershttps://twitter.com/KuraFire/status/894378360041684992 …
Wibberrrrrrr128 💻 🖥️ 🖱️ added,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wibrr @CrecusLohe and
Actually, just look at
@alicemazzy’s major flaw: chart on the left is women as % compared to men, not hard numbers. Rebranding’s irrelevant.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KuraFire @CrecusLohe and
Unless Alice is arguing that the rebranding occurred for women entering CompSci but it didn’t occur for men doing the same, in which case…pic.twitter.com/g0ODLZTJXp
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
both charts are percentage women, I'm not sure what your point is
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @KuraFire and
unless you mean women weren't actually "forced out", just large male influx
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
in which case that may be a fair point
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.