What I tell you three times is true: class isn't income. Class isn't income. Class isn't income. https://twitter.com/LeFabe/status/884869906298056704 …
-
-
not just different meanings: there's a whole literature dedicated to working out how economic, social and cultural capital interact causally
-
Yes. They are entangled, just not identical. But Brooks is quite clearly talking about social class, not income.
-
economic class isn't reducible to "income". & anyway Brooks is clearly talking about cultural capital, not social capital
-
even if he's not aware he's talking about things a developed & attested theory already exists for. & he sounds like he may very well not be
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also tv writers aren't working class, there are more categories than just labor and bourgeoise goddamnit
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gender has that problem too
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.