I was excited for a sec because I thought this meant nationwide concealed carry but it is actually just for themhttps://twitter.com/Kredo0/status/877248982782795776 …
state would argue congresspeople have an unusual need compared to common people
-
-
alternatively they might just strike it down as federal overreach if somehow it actually did pass
-
fun fact, eisenstadt v. baird established right to privacy on equal protection grounds
-
following from griswold v. connecticut which established right to *marital* privacy, here ruled discriminatory
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.