see how the priestly class went absolutely insane during the election, totally isolated from reality. and that was only people who did that
-
-
woke types accuse these systems of amplifying human biases, hbd types say they reveal biases as truths. I don't think either is quite right
-
assuming reasonably well-designed system, would likely handle vast majority of cases better than average and fail spectacularly on outliers
-
this would strike most as a shocking abrogation of (the ideal of) justice, as well as put a more material fear in said outliers
-
but the way the question will be posed is, do the aggregate effects justify the collateral damage?
-
and, given the track record, I expect most will answer in the affirmative
-
Slightly more worrying: how many would answer in affirmative even if tradeoff clearly bad, if it reduces the monetary cost of the system?
-
how bout: tradeoff bad *and* more expensive but funnels pork to contractors in district and creates appearance of decisive action
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Legal ecosystem, medical diagnostic ecosystem, manufacturing ecosystem, clerical ecosystems, sales ecosystems, scheduling already 90%.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.