We're talking about completely different use cases btw
-
-
now seems like a good time to drop this https://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/08/uberfact-ultimate-social-verifier.html …
-
more formally, Q is "if I had infinite time to research X [subject, person, author, w/e] what would I conclude of X"https://twitter.com/alicemazzy/status/855244881408573440 …
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Why isn't this already available for Twitter? I use "people you follow also follow this unknown user" a bit like that
-
bc Twitter engineers are terrible at systems thinking, they would kill if they built mutual-follow maps into something much greater
-
or because there was a rash of startups in ~2012 building stuff like that and they all died
-
hard to monetize — probably only enough directly paying market for a small lifestyle biz
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Which includes a liar that is looking for stats and will say anything to trigger clicks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"But Infowars is not journalism" you see? That's why journalism is dying. Good riddance to it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Journalism is a modern phenomenon that is unnatural and not needed. Like mercury fillings.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The assumption journalism will always exist is wrong. It can die, and completely vanish forever
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The world is far better off without this practice. Infowars proves this categorically.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We just saw an article on Forbes that fits this. 100% "lies for clicks". Very nasty and bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.